The approval post is not proof
A screenshot of an approved visa proves a student got in, not that you got them in. It also looks identical across forty pages, which is why nobody reads it twice.
Put your counsellor on camera weekly
One person, answering one question, in the language the student would ask it in.
- One country, one requirement, one minute: IELTS bands, funds, gap years.
- What the intake calendar actually looks like month by month.
- A student explaining their timeline, not thanking you.
- The honest version of the cost, including what nobody mentions.
Answer the fear, not the dream
Students are not scared of picking the wrong university. They are scared of a rejection, of losing the fee they paid, and of a consultancy that stops replying after the deposit. Say what happens in each case.
Post to the intake cycle
Enquiries move in a pattern you can plan around around intakes and exam results. Your heaviest publishing belongs in the eight weeks before applications close, not evenly across the year.
Bad line, good line.
A screenshot of an approved visa with "Congratulations!" over it.
"Funds proof for Australia: how much, in whose name, for how long."
"100% visa success rate."
"Two of our last twenty were refused. Here is what both had in common."
Worked example: one counsellor, eight weeks
What a consultancy should publish
One requirement explained per video.
Real students, dates and outcomes.
Fees and steps in plain words.
Students do not compare consultancies. They compare the one counsellor they have watched speak.
Three things you can do now.
We do this every month for clients.
Scripts, filming, editing, posting, and a simple monthly report. Our prices are on the pricing page.
